Choosing between polycarbonate and ceramic urinals: which is best for your space?

, ,

When it comes to fitting out a washroom and installing URIMAT waterless urinals, one key decision is choosing between polycarbonate and ceramic waterless urinals. Both materials have unique characteristics, and understanding their differences can help you select the right one for your project. Whether you’re looking at ease of installation, sustainability or aesthetics, here’s a breakdown of what each material offers and when one might be more appropriate than the other.

Size Options

  • Ceramic Urinals: Ceramic urinals come in two sizes: standard and compact. If your space is limited and you need a smaller unit, ceramic is your go-to option.
  • Polycarbonate Urinals: Polycarbonate urinals only come in a standard size. This makes them suitable for larger or more flexible spaces, but not ideal if you require a compact design.

When to Choose Ceramic: If you need a compact model due to space constraints, ceramic is the only option.

Advertising Features

  • Polycarbonate urinals: These urinals offer the possibility of incorporating static advertising or a flyer cutout through the Ecoplus model. This feature is only available in the polycarbonate versions, making them a popular choice for venues that want to include messaging or branding within the washroom.
  • Ceramic Urinals: Ceramic urinals do not offer this feature.

When to Choose Polycarbonate: If in-urinal advertising is a priority, such as in high-traffic public restrooms or commercial venues, the polycarbonate Ecoplus model is the best option.

Weight and Handling

  • Ceramic Urinals: Ceramic is heavier and more difficult to handle during installation. It often requires specialized equipment or more manpower, which can increase installation time and costs.
  • Polycarbonate Urinals: Polycarbonate models are lightweight, making them easier and faster to install. They are much more manageable for installers, reducing labour costs and time.

When to Choose Polycarbonate: For large-scale projects or quick installations, the lightweight nature of polycarbonate urinals makes them the more efficient option.

Architect Preferences

Some architects, particularly those with more traditional views, tend to lean toward ceramic urinals. This preference is often based on a long-standing belief in the durability and classic appearance of ceramics. However, this mindset may be changing as more environmentally conscious options like polycarbonate come to the forefront. In some cases, architects stick with ceramic out of habit or a desire for traditional aesthetics, even when clients or contractors push for more modern solutions like polycarbonate.

On a recent project, for example, the client favoured polycarbonate urinals for environmental reasons on most floors. However, in areas where architects took the lead, ceramic models were installed despite the client’s preference for polycarbonate.

Shipping and Environmental Impact

  • Ceramic Urinals: Due to their fragility, ceramic urinals must be shipped via pallet transport, which increases costs and has a higher carbon footprint. They cannot be stacked efficiently for shipping, making logistics more complicated.
  • Polycarbonate Urinals: These urinals can be stacked for shipping, making them easier to transport. Additionally, their lightweight nature means that shipping is cheaper and has a lower environmental impact.

When to Choose Polycarbonate: If you are looking to reduce shipping costs and your project’s carbon footprint, polycarbonate urinals are the more sustainable choice.

Durability and Vandalism Concerns

  • Ceramic Urinals: Ceramic is robust but can be hazardous if vandalized. A smashed ceramic urinal poses a significant safety risk due to sharp, heavy shards.
  • Polycarbonate Urinals: Polycarbonate urinals are more durable in general and easier to manage if damaged. While no material is entirely vandal-proof, a cracked polycarbonate model is safer and simpler to replace than a shattered ceramic one.

When to Choose Polycarbonate: For venues with higher vandalism risks (e.g., public facilities or bars), polycarbonate is safer and easier to maintain in the event of damage.

Client Preferences and Space Considerations

When recommending a urinal type, the decision often depends on client preferences, washroom size, and specific project needs:

  • If the client wants a compact model, ceramic is the default choice.
  • If the client prefers in-urinal advertising (e.g., bars, restaurants, or stadiums), the polycarbonate Ecoplus is the only option.
  • For retrofit installations, polycarbonate models are preferred because their larger footprint covers existing wall finishes, avoiding the need for additional remedial work.

Summary: Which Should You Choose?

1. Go for Polycarbonate if:

  • You need an eco-friendly option with a lower carbon footprint.
  • You want a lightweight, easy-to-install solution.
  • You plan to include static advertising in the urinal.
  • Safety concerns around vandalism are a priority.
  • Shipping costs and logistics are a major consideration.

2. Go for Ceramic if:

  • You need a compact size due to space limitations.
  • You’re working with a traditional architect who prefers classic materials.
  • Aesthetic consistency with other ceramic fixtures is important.

Both materials offer distinct benefits, and the best choice ultimately depends on the unique demands of your project. Whether you’re driven by environmental concerns, budget, or design preferences, understanding the differences between polycarbonate and ceramic urinals will help you make an informed decision that meets both practical and aesthetic requirements

  • Managing director

    Marcus is a mechanical engineer by training with many years’ experience in the construction industry especially related to mechanical, sanitary and washroom applications.

Take Action Now

Start saving water, energy, and costs. Contact us to begin your sustainability journey.

CONTACT US
Scroll to Top